Google+ is not a ‘product’ apparently. It’s still a ‘project’. And it’s out in what looks to be a limited
beta release as ‘Field Trial’ – but which feels more like a ‘throttled release’
as new users can then start to pass invites on.
Google clearly feels that this is all a work in progress.
However, it doesn’t feel like work in progress. It has hit
10m users in a few short weeks making it one of the fastest growing network
launches ever, according to Mashable.
The interface is clean and slick – and Circles makes the concept of ‘groups’
easy to implement and manage. Even the animation
when you add a friend or contact to a group is a great little piece of
interactive design.
And there are other features not found elsewhere. ‘Sparks’ looks like it could build into a
powerful content recommendation engine, especially once Google+ gains
scale. It also provides a good benefit for
users to actually ‘Google +1’ content they find or that their friends may
like. It could also be strong
opportunity to monetise the platform as brands looks to promote their own
content.
‘Hangout’s are fundamentally video chat (though trying to
get that to actually work is a little tricky) – and Facebook’s video chat via
Skype looks like it could trump that feature right off the bat.
And I suppose that’s the problem with Google+ so far. There’s no killer feature. There’s no compelling reason why this should
be my new social network of choice – no reason to give up Facebook. And I don’t need yet another network in my
life.
Even Google’s own FAQs include the question “Why don’t you
have killer feature X?”.
So far, I wager that a large proportion of Google+’s growth has
been driven by its limited access and exclusivity.
It’s the power of scarcity.
Everyone in the digerati wanted an invite and the power to
send invites. How many of Facebook’s
News Feed updates were posted from Google+ - just to demonstrate one’s own personal
sense of digital status?
But where’s Google+’s utility? Where does it add value to my
life that no other platform does? Facebook created that social utility by
connecting people with their friends - and it became the dominant social
network by doing that better than anyone else.
And it continuously evolved functionality that was useful: from pokes, picture
tagging, status updates to Like’s, Fan pages and Facebook plug-ins.
However, Facebook needs to continue being useful. As Mark Choueke says in Marketing Week, unless
it continues to evolve its utility, people will start to drift away from the
constant wall of trivial personal updates and stilted brand updates. (I’m really not sure I can take another brand
asking what I am up to for the weekend, each Friday afternoon).
There is some interesting data that shows that although Facebook
is growing globally, in some more mature markets Facebook is seeing a
decline. For example in the US
(according to Inside Facebook) it lost 6 million users during May this year and
in Canada it lost 8% of users (1.52million out of its 16.6m base).
And this trend is mirrored in the UK. According to Hitwise,
Facebook has also seen a declining market share losing ground to both Twitter
and YouTube.
Now, of course, this doesn’t for a second mean that this is
even the beginning of the end for Facebook.
But it does demonstrate the need to keep things fresh and,
most importantly, useful. It will be
interesting to see how Facebook’s Skype partnership adds to its utility and how
Google+ intends to create some significant space between it and Facebook.
No comments:
Post a Comment